Monday, November 27, 2006

The BNP

I loathe the BNP. I find their economic policies absurd and their racial policies repugnant. I would no sooner vote for them than I would support New Zealand at rugby. Almost everything about them, from their sharp-suited spivvishness to their shaven-headed thuggishness makes nauseates me. And yet I feel moved to write a post in defence of them. I was originally going to call this post 'In defence of the BNP' but worried that it might jeopardise my job. And that is the problem.

This morning, on the Today programme, in a discussion of the fight between the ghastly Mayor of London and Trevor Phillips, Trevor Phillips defended his history on racial conflict by boasting he had made it illegal for prison officers to be members of the BNP. Government ministers openly reflected that, in light of the acquittal of the leader of the BNP laws should be changed so that they could get him next time. It was mooted that no member could join the police or work in the civil service as a whole. The BNP is a legal political party. It happens to be a vile one, but I think much the same about Respect, and not much more of the Liberal Democrats.

It is deeply, deeply disturbing that we have become so intolerant of certain minority opinions that we are prepared to bend and even break our own rules in order to disoblige those that hold them. The best way to defeat the BNP is to treat them as a political party, engage on the issues and demonstrate their failings. To treat them as an illegal body, when they are not, goes against every fibre of the British legal system. I am rather surprised that I feel this strongly, after all I have a visceral dislike for them and all their works (a dislike I am deliberately emphasising, as a gesture of how craven I am on the subject), yet principles of liberty, of free speech and freedom of association within the law are far far more important.

If one is only free to hold popular opinions, to have mainstream views, to join respectable parties or to believe conventional truths one is not truly free. If we believe that certain thoughts should be outlawed, and that it should be easier to ban political parties because we dislike the views they espouse, then we really are becoming little better than that which we seek to silence.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Absolutely spot on. My brand of Conservatism values liberty above all. It's not that equality is unimportant, but if ever there is a tension between the two, then liberty must take precedence.

It is unfortunate that David Cameron seems to be almost as obsessed with equality issues as Nu-Labour. The front bench should have criticised the improper comments about the Griffin acquittal by the two most senior legal figures in the Government.

Martin

8:25 pm  
Anonymous chameleon said...

You're right, the government does not have the right to discriminate towards any legal political party, however disgusting they are. Don't make them martyrs! Just look at what locking Hitler up did!

9:01 pm  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home